One finds oneself in a terrible predicament regarding language and communication.
Indeed while two or more organisms attempt to co-ordinate their actions with each-other such difficulties are bound to be an unfortunate inevitability.
The issues engendered whilst communicating are manifold:
So, nachinat the bratchny boorjoyce yarlbes used by journalitas and gazettas and their brattywats is cal O my droogies, I am not on my odiknocks in skrying that. But what do I find O my Brothers? I find such bezoomny lewdies have skvated up the use of the written slovo from our very paws, how my brothers? by getting their gratchny mewling into our poor razodoks swifter than we can sick it up.
Then the archaey pretentihoes- the Ivory-towered preferences, much favoured by offishy channelings as well as the certain others not to say more and so on and etc... certain individualists such as myself on occasioning is seen by as an improvemerry, but only as you'll see a smallish one, it is coming increasingfold fosilized and futhermore removed from the noble englishwold as she is very often spoke! such folly!
It has oftlode not been used in very many cases at all where it is much plain to the untrained absorber to see to say an awful lot of things into it all despite of the factorymold of it unessarily taking up an awfhoe lot of precious never to be regained breath. It encourages the speakold of their own mighty super-rioty even at the terribold expenses of their humanitarian dreamwold.
It is doable to speak-think double-plus-unless simplefully, I am ungood at simple oldspeaking, ante-oldspeaks by ante-unpersons is unsimple samewise, some oldspeaks is maybe not-same, but most unsimple or double-plus-old. I bellyfeeled need for simple & unsame-speak.
To gain entry by escraping, up-using the pan-chein reg gie'em of morternity agin it's self as it has bean ton monet a thighme before the present, paris-doxically one might suppose or so one wouldn't it anyway but ah well sewer and-enough, in odour to get me pour besthrottled presentimints postited more teemt ant... so deales teak oer't, they have to hipdy stick to the court narwall of the joister-notes of well noam high re-numb, ah putputputput isn't severy hid-a-teelt none of it the less is more or more of it the less?
No, Isn't it weal no-it arownd tees-parts or is it not? that wen jupiter or mercury be in their attendence on a clear night in the merrye month of June the twenty-third and on a blue moon in a month of sitterdye, ah tickerful sounds of Munich come a crawling from castle walls to the surrounding heirs and graces ameen.
Not confined me-self to those tark-ant-timshal-tungeons, i-i-i-I neyther having no crater-fence to me nail'em (prrr!) and neither planning to commit any, hens forget; one must aither bend down to lick glean and polish the boots whose sandals you are unworthy of the name to untie- of the stark past masters of the days of the elm-eld-old-ald-ill monarch, God rest her sow, neither that or.
Because of the above difficulties I considered writing something first in French, then in Esperanto (after first learning how to speak those languages) but then I remembered learning about another constructed language like Esperanto called Toki-Pona, Toki-Pona is a minimal language with the advantage of having little more than a hundred words...
Toki Pona I believe solves most of my linguistic problems, not only is it a seperate language, relatively new, innovative, simple and resistant to affectation, it has the magic combination of being both esoteric and easily understood with quite minimal effort regardless of the reader's background.
To become conversationally fluent in Toki-Pona will take months, but with enough thought it should be possible for someone with very little knowledge to understand what has been written, simply by consulting the very small vocabuluary and understanding the very basic grammar.
Thanks, or no thanks to Owrell, Burgess, Unwin and Joyce.